GIT-REPLAY(1) Git Manual GIT-REPLAY(1)
git-replay - EXPERIMENTAL: Replay commits on a new base, works with
bare repos too
(EXPERIMENTAL!) git replay ([--contained] --onto <newbase> | --advance <branch>) [--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>
Takes a range of commits and replays them onto a new location. Leaves
the working tree and the index untouched. By default, updates the
relevant references using an atomic transaction (all refs update or
none). Use --ref-action=print to avoid automatic ref updates and
instead get update commands that can be piped to git update-ref
--stdin (see the OUTPUT section below).
THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. THE BEHAVIOR MAY CHANGE.
--onto <newbase>
Starting point at which to create the new commits. May be any
valid commit, and not just an existing branch name.
When --onto is specified, the branch(es) in the revision range
will be updated to point at the new commits, similar to the way
git rebase --update-refs updates multiple branches in the
affected range.
--advance <branch>
Starting point at which to create the new commits; must be a
branch name.
The history is replayed on top of the <branch> and <branch> is
updated to point at the tip of the resulting history. This is
different from --onto, which uses the target only as a starting
point without updating it.
--contained
Update all branches that point at commits in <revision-range>.
Requires --onto.
--ref-action[=<mode>]
Control how references are updated. The mode can be:
+o update (default): Update refs directly using an atomic
transaction. All refs are updated or none are (all-or-nothing
behavior).
+o print: Output update-ref commands for pipeline use. This is
the traditional behavior where output can be piped to git
update-ref --stdin.
The default mode can be configured via the replay.refAction
configuration variable.
<revision-range>
Range of commits to replay; see "Specifying Ranges" in git-rev-
parse(1). In --advance <branch> mode, the range should have a
single tip, so that it's clear to which tip the advanced <branch>
should point.
Besides specifying a range of commits that should be listed using the
special notations explained in the description, additional commit
limiting may be applied.
Using more options generally further limits the output (e.g.
--since=<date1> limits to commits newer than <date1>, and using it
with --grep=<pattern> further limits to commits whose log message has
a line that matches <pattern>), unless otherwise noted.
Note that these are applied before commit ordering and formatting
options, such as --reverse.
-<number>, -n <number>, --max-count=<number>
Limit the output to <number> commits.
--skip=<number>
Skip <number> commits before starting to show the commit output.
--since=<date>, --after=<date>
Show commits more recent than <date>.
--since-as-filter=<date>
Show all commits more recent than <date>. This visits all commits
in the range, rather than stopping at the first commit which is
older than <date>.
--until=<date>, --before=<date>
Show commits older than <date>.
--author=<pattern>, --committer=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with author/committer header
lines that match the <pattern> regular expression. With more than
one --author=<pattern>, commits whose author matches any of the
<pattern> are chosen (similarly for multiple
--committer=<pattern>).
--grep-reflog=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with reflog entries that match
the <pattern> regular expression. With more than one
--grep-reflog, commits whose reflog message matches any of the
given patterns are chosen. It is an error to use this option
unless --walk-reflogs is in use.
--grep=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with a log message that matches
the <pattern> regular expression. With more than one
--grep=<pattern>, commits whose message matches any of the
<pattern> are chosen (but see --all-match).
When --notes is in effect, the message from the notes is matched
as if it were part of the log message.
--all-match
Limit the commits output to ones that match all given --grep,
instead of ones that match at least one.
--invert-grep
Limit the commits output to ones with a log message that do not
match the <pattern> specified with --grep=<pattern>.
-i, --regexp-ignore-case
Match the regular expression limiting patterns without regard to
letter case.
--basic-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be basic regular expressions;
this is the default.
-E, --extended-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be extended regular expressions
instead of the default basic regular expressions.
-F, --fixed-strings
Consider the limiting patterns to be fixed strings (don't
interpret pattern as a regular expression).
-P, --perl-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be Perl-compatible regular
expressions.
Support for these types of regular expressions is an optional
compile-time dependency. If Git wasn't compiled with support for
them providing this option will cause it to die.
--remove-empty
Stop when a given path disappears from the tree.
--merges
Print only merge commits. This is exactly the same as
--min-parents=2.
--no-merges
Do not print commits with more than one parent. This is exactly
the same as --max-parents=1.
--min-parents=<number>, --max-parents=<number>, --no-min-parents,
--no-max-parents
Show only commits which have at least (or at most) that many
parent commits. In particular, --max-parents=1 is the same as
--no-merges, --min-parents=2 is the same as --merges.
--max-parents=0 gives all root commits and --min-parents=3 all
octopus merges.
--no-min-parents and --no-max-parents reset these limits (to no
limit) again. Equivalent forms are --min-parents=0 (any commit
has 0 or more parents) and --max-parents=-1 (negative numbers
denote no upper limit).
--first-parent
When finding commits to include, follow only the first parent
commit upon seeing a merge commit. This option can give a better
overview when viewing the evolution of a particular topic branch,
because merges into a topic branch tend to be only about
adjusting to updated upstream from time to time, and this option
allows you to ignore the individual commits brought in to your
history by such a merge.
--exclude-first-parent-only
When finding commits to exclude (with a ^), follow only the first
parent commit upon seeing a merge commit. This can be used to
find the set of changes in a topic branch from the point where it
diverged from the remote branch, given that arbitrary merges can
be valid topic branch changes.
--not
Reverses the meaning of the ^ prefix (or lack thereof) for all
following revision specifiers, up to the next --not. When used on
the command line before --stdin, the revisions passed through
stdin will not be affected by it. Conversely, when passed via
standard input, the revisions passed on the command line will not
be affected by it.
--all
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/, along with HEAD, are listed
on the command line as <commit>.
--branches[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/heads are listed on the
command line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit branches
to ones matching given shell glob. If <pattern> lacks ?, *, or [,
/* at the end is implied.
--tags[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/tags are listed on the command
line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit tags to ones
matching given shell glob. If pattern lacks ?, *, or [, /* at the
end is implied.
--remotes[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/remotes are listed on the
command line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit
remote-tracking branches to ones matching given shell glob. If
pattern lacks ?, *, or [, /* at the end is implied.
--glob=<glob-pattern>
Pretend as if all the refs matching shell glob <glob-pattern> are
listed on the command line as <commit>. Leading refs/, is
automatically prepended if missing. If pattern lacks ?, *, or [,
/* at the end is implied.
--exclude=<glob-pattern>
Do not include refs matching <glob-pattern> that the next --all,
--branches, --tags, --remotes, or --glob would otherwise
consider. Repetitions of this option accumulate exclusion
patterns up to the next --all, --branches, --tags, --remotes, or
--glob option (other options or arguments do not clear
accumulated patterns).
The patterns given should not begin with refs/heads, refs/tags,
or refs/remotes when applied to --branches, --tags, or --remotes,
respectively, and they must begin with refs/ when applied to
--glob or --all. If a trailing /* is intended, it must be given
explicitly.
--exclude-hidden=(fetch|receive|uploadpack)
Do not include refs that would be hidden by git-fetch,
git-receive-pack or git-upload-pack by consulting the appropriate
fetch.hideRefs, receive.hideRefs or uploadpack.hideRefs
configuration along with transfer.hideRefs (see git-config(1)).
This option affects the next pseudo-ref option --all or --glob
and is cleared after processing them.
--reflog
Pretend as if all objects mentioned by reflogs are listed on the
command line as <commit>.
--alternate-refs
Pretend as if all objects mentioned as ref tips of alternate
repositories were listed on the command line. An alternate
repository is any repository whose object directory is specified
in objects/info/alternates. The set of included objects may be
modified by core.alternateRefsCommand, etc. See git-config(1).
--single-worktree
By default, all working trees will be examined by the following
options when there are more than one (see git-worktree(1)):
--all, --reflog and --indexed-objects. This option forces them to
examine the current working tree only.
--ignore-missing
Upon seeing an invalid object name in the input, pretend as if
the bad input was not given.
--bisect
Pretend as if the bad bisection ref refs/bisect/bad was listed
and as if it was followed by --not and the good bisection refs
refs/bisect/good-* on the command line.
--stdin
In addition to getting arguments from the command line, read them
from standard input as well. This accepts commits and
pseudo-options like --all and --glob=. When a -- separator is
seen, the following input is treated as paths and used to limit
the result. Flags like --not which are read via standard input
are only respected for arguments passed in the same way and will
not influence any subsequent command line arguments.
--cherry-mark
Like --cherry-pick (see below) but mark equivalent commits with =
rather than omitting them, and inequivalent ones with +.
--cherry-pick
Omit any commit that introduces the same change as another commit
on the "other side" when the set of commits are limited with
symmetric difference.
For example, if you have two branches, A and B, a usual way to
list all commits on only one side of them is with --left-right
(see the example below in the description of the --left-right
option). However, it shows the commits that were cherry-picked
from the other branch (for example, "3rd on b" may be
cherry-picked from branch A). With this option, such pairs of
commits are excluded from the output.
--left-only, --right-only
List only commits on the respective side of a symmetric
difference, i.e. only those which would be marked < resp. > by
--left-right.
For example, --cherry-pick --right-only A...B omits those commits
from B which are in A or are patch-equivalent to a commit in A.
In other words, this lists the + commits from git cherry A B.
More precisely, --cherry-pick --right-only --no-merges gives the
exact list.
--cherry
A synonym for --right-only --cherry-mark --no-merges; useful to
limit the output to the commits on our side and mark those that
have been applied to the other side of a forked history with git
log --cherry upstream...mybranch, similar to git cherry upstream
mybranch.
-g, --walk-reflogs
Instead of walking the commit ancestry chain, walk reflog entries
from the most recent one to older ones. When this option is used
you cannot specify commits to exclude (that is, ^<commit>,
<commit1>..<commit2>, and <commit1>...<commit2> notations cannot
be used).
With --pretty format other than oneline and reference (for
obvious reasons), this causes the output to have two extra lines
of information taken from the reflog. The reflog designator in
the output may be shown as ref@{<Nth>} (where <Nth> is the
reverse-chronological index in the reflog) or as
ref@{<timestamp>} (with the <timestamp> for that entry),
depending on a few rules:
1. If the starting point is specified as ref@{<Nth>}, show the
index format.
2. If the starting point was specified as ref@{now}, show the
timestamp format.
3. If neither was used, but --date was given on the command
line, show the timestamp in the format requested by --date.
4. Otherwise, show the index format.
Under --pretty=oneline, the commit message is prefixed with this
information on the same line. This option cannot be combined with
--reverse. See also git-reflog(1).
Under --pretty=reference, this information will not be shown at
all.
--merge
Show commits touching conflicted paths in the range
HEAD...<other>, where <other> is the first existing pseudoref in
MERGE_HEAD, CHERRY_PICK_HEAD, REVERT_HEAD or REBASE_HEAD. Only
works when the index has unmerged entries. This option can be
used to show relevant commits when resolving conflicts from a
3-way merge.
--boundary
Output excluded boundary commits. Boundary commits are prefixed
with -.
Sometimes you are only interested in parts of the history, for
example the commits modifying a particular <path>. But there are two
parts of History Simplification, one part is selecting the commits
and the other is how to do it, as there are various strategies to
simplify the history.
The following options select the commits to be shown:
<paths>
Commits modifying the given <paths> are selected.
--simplify-by-decoration
Commits that are referred by some branch or tag are selected.
Note that extra commits can be shown to give a meaningful history.
The following options affect the way the simplification is performed:
Default mode
Simplifies the history to the simplest history explaining the
final state of the tree. Simplest because it prunes some side
branches if the end result is the same (i.e. merging branches
with the same content)
--show-pulls
Include all commits from the default mode, but also any merge
commits that are not TREESAME to the first parent but are
TREESAME to a later parent. This mode is helpful for showing the
merge commits that "first introduced" a change to a branch.
--full-history
Same as the default mode, but does not prune some history.
--dense
Only the selected commits are shown, plus some to have a
meaningful history.
--sparse
All commits in the simplified history are shown.
--simplify-merges
Additional option to --full-history to remove some needless
merges from the resulting history, as there are no selected
commits contributing to this merge.
--ancestry-path[=<commit>]
When given a range of commits to display (e.g.
<commit1>..<commit2> or <commit2> ^<commit1>), and a commit
<commit> in that range, only display commits in that range that
are ancestors of <commit>, descendants of <commit>, or <commit>
itself. If no commit is specified, use <commit1> (the excluded
part of the range) as <commit>. Can be passed multiple times; if
so, a commit is included if it is any of the commits given or if
it is an ancestor or descendant of one of them.
A more detailed explanation follows.
Suppose you specified foo as the <paths>. We shall call commits that
modify foo !TREESAME, and the rest TREESAME. (In a diff filtered for
foo, they look different and equal, respectively.)
In the following, we will always refer to the same example history to
illustrate the differences between simplification settings. We assume
that you are filtering for a file foo in this commit graph:
.-A---M---N---O---P---Q
/ / / / / /
I B C D E Y
\ / / / / /
`-------------' X
The horizontal line of history A---Q is taken to be the first parent
of each merge. The commits are:
+o I is the initial commit, in which foo exists with contents asdf,
and a file quux exists with contents quux. Initial commits are
compared to an empty tree, so I is !TREESAME.
+o In A, foo contains just foo.
+o B contains the same change as A. Its merge M is trivial and hence
TREESAME to all parents.
+o C does not change foo, but its merge N changes it to foobar, so
it is not TREESAME to any parent.
+o D sets foo to baz. Its merge O combines the strings from N and D
to foobarbaz; i.e., it is not TREESAME to any parent.
+o E changes quux to xyzzy, and its merge P combines the strings to
quux xyzzy. P is TREESAME to O, but not to E.
+o X is an independent root commit that added a new file side, and Y
modified it. Y is TREESAME to X. Its merge Q added side to P,
and Q is TREESAME to P, but not to Y.
rev-list walks backwards through history, including or excluding
commits based on whether --full-history and/or parent rewriting (via
--parents or --children) are used. The following settings are
available.
Default mode
Commits are included if they are not TREESAME to any parent
(though this can be changed, see --sparse below). If the commit
was a merge, and it was TREESAME to one parent, follow only that
parent. (Even if there are several TREESAME parents, follow only
one of them.) Otherwise, follow all parents.
This results in:
.-A---N---O
/ / /
I---------D
Note how the rule to only follow the TREESAME parent, if one is
available, removed B from consideration entirely. C was
considered via N, but is TREESAME. Root commits are compared to
an empty tree, so I is !TREESAME.
Parent/child relations are only visible with --parents, but that
does not affect the commits selected in default mode, so we have
shown the parent lines.
--full-history without parent rewriting
This mode differs from the default in one point: always follow
all parents of a merge, even if it is TREESAME to one of them.
Even if more than one side of the merge has commits that are
included, this does not imply that the merge itself is! In the
example, we get
I A B N D O P Q
M was excluded because it is TREESAME to both parents. E, C and
B were all walked, but only B was !TREESAME, so the others do not
appear.
Note that without parent rewriting, it is not really possible to
talk about the parent/child relationships between the commits, so
we show them disconnected.
--full-history with parent rewriting
Ordinary commits are only included if they are !TREESAME (though
this can be changed, see --sparse below).
Merges are always included. However, their parent list is
rewritten: Along each parent, prune away commits that are not
included themselves. This results in
.-A---M---N---O---P---Q
/ / / / /
I B / D /
\ / / / /
`-------------'
Compare to --full-history without rewriting above. Note that E
was pruned away because it is TREESAME, but the parent list of P
was rewritten to contain E's parent I. The same happened for C
and N, and X, Y and Q.
In addition to the above settings, you can change whether TREESAME
affects inclusion:
--dense
Commits that are walked are included if they are not TREESAME to
any parent.
--sparse
All commits that are walked are included.
Note that without --full-history, this still simplifies merges:
if one of the parents is TREESAME, we follow only that one, so
the other sides of the merge are never walked.
--simplify-merges
First, build a history graph in the same way that --full-history
with parent rewriting does (see above).
Then simplify each commit C to its replacement C' in the final
history according to the following rules:
+o Set C' to C.
+o Replace each parent P of C' with its simplification P'. In
the process, drop parents that are ancestors of other parents
or that are root commits TREESAME to an empty tree, and
remove duplicates, but take care to never drop all parents
that we are TREESAME to.
+o If after this parent rewriting, C' is a root or merge commit
(has zero or >1 parents), a boundary commit, or !TREESAME, it
remains. Otherwise, it is replaced with its only parent.
The effect of this is best shown by way of comparing to
--full-history with parent rewriting. The example turns into:
.-A---M---N---O
/ / /
I B D
\ / /
`---------'
Note the major differences in N, P, and Q over --full-history:
+o N's parent list had I removed, because it is an ancestor of
the other parent M. Still, N remained because it is
!TREESAME.
+o P's parent list similarly had I removed. P was then removed
completely, because it had one parent and is TREESAME.
+o Q's parent list had Y simplified to X. X was then removed,
because it was a TREESAME root. Q was then removed
completely, because it had one parent and is TREESAME.
There is another simplification mode available:
--ancestry-path[=<commit>]
Limit the displayed commits to those which are an ancestor of
<commit>, or which are a descendant of <commit>, or are <commit>
itself.
As an example use case, consider the following commit history:
D---E-------F
/ \ \
B---C---G---H---I---J
/ \
A-------K---------------L--M
A regular D..M computes the set of commits that are ancestors of
M, but excludes the ones that are ancestors of D. This is useful
to see what happened to the history leading to M since D, in the
sense that "what does M have that did not exist in D". The result
in this example would be all the commits, except A and B (and D
itself, of course).
When we want to find out what commits in M are contaminated with
the bug introduced by D and need fixing, however, we might want
to view only the subset of D..M that are actually descendants of
D, i.e. excluding C and K. This is exactly what the
--ancestry-path option does. Applied to the D..M range, it
results in:
E-------F
\ \
G---H---I---J
\
L--M
We can also use --ancestry-path=D instead of --ancestry-path
which means the same thing when applied to the D..M range but is
just more explicit.
If we instead are interested in a given topic within this range,
and all commits affected by that topic, we may only want to view
the subset of D..M which contain that topic in their ancestry
path. So, using --ancestry-path=H D..M for example would result
in:
E
\
C---G---H---I---J
\
L--M
Whereas --ancestry-path=K D..M would result in
K---------------L--M
Before discussing another option, --show-pulls, we need to create a
new example history.
A common problem users face when looking at simplified history is
that a commit they know changed a file somehow does not appear in the
file's simplified history. Let's demonstrate a new example and show
how options such as --full-history and --simplify-merges works in
that case:
.-A---M-----C--N---O---P
/ / \ \ \/ / /
I B \ R-'`-Z' /
\ / \/ /
\ / /\ /
`---X--' `---Y--'
For this example, suppose I created file.txt which was modified by A,
B, and X in different ways. The single-parent commits C, Z, and Y do
not change file.txt. The merge commit M was created by resolving the
merge conflict to include both changes from A and B and hence is not
TREESAME to either. The merge commit R, however, was created by
ignoring the contents of file.txt at M and taking only the contents
of file.txt at X. Hence, R is TREESAME to X but not M. Finally, the
natural merge resolution to create N is to take the contents of
file.txt at R, so N is TREESAME to R but not C. The merge commits O
and P are TREESAME to their first parents, but not to their second
parents, Z and Y respectively.
When using the default mode, N and R both have a TREESAME parent, so
those edges are walked and the others are ignored. The resulting
history graph is:
I---X
When using --full-history, Git walks every edge. This will discover
the commits A and B and the merge M, but also will reveal the merge
commits O and P. With parent rewriting, the resulting graph is:
.-A---M--------N---O---P
/ / \ \ \/ / /
I B \ R-'`--' /
\ / \/ /
\ / /\ /
`---X--' `------'
Here, the merge commits O and P contribute extra noise, as they did
not actually contribute a change to file.txt. They only merged a
topic that was based on an older version of file.txt. This is a
common issue in repositories using a workflow where many contributors
work in parallel and merge their topic branches along a single trunk:
many unrelated merges appear in the --full-history results.
When using the --simplify-merges option, the commits O and P
disappear from the results. This is because the rewritten second
parents of O and P are reachable from their first parents. Those
edges are removed and then the commits look like single-parent
commits that are TREESAME to their parent. This also happens to the
commit N, resulting in a history view as follows:
.-A---M--.
/ / \
I B R
\ / /
\ / /
`---X--'
In this view, we see all of the important single-parent changes from
A, B, and X. We also see the carefully-resolved merge M and the
not-so-carefully-resolved merge R. This is usually enough information
to determine why the commits A and B "disappeared" from history in
the default view. However, there are a few issues with this approach.
The first issue is performance. Unlike any previous option, the
--simplify-merges option requires walking the entire commit history
before returning a single result. This can make the option difficult
to use for very large repositories.
The second issue is one of auditing. When many contributors are
working on the same repository, it is important which merge commits
introduced a change into an important branch. The problematic merge R
above is not likely to be the merge commit that was used to merge
into an important branch. Instead, the merge N was used to merge R
and X into the important branch. This commit may have information
about why the change X came to override the changes from A and B in
its commit message.
--show-pulls
In addition to the commits shown in the default history, show
each merge commit that is not TREESAME to its first parent but is
TREESAME to a later parent.
When a merge commit is included by --show-pulls, the merge is
treated as if it "pulled" the change from another branch. When
using --show-pulls on this example (and no other options) the
resulting graph is:
I---X---R---N
Here, the merge commits R and N are included because they pulled
the commits X and R into the base branch, respectively. These
merges are the reason the commits A and B do not appear in the
default history.
When --show-pulls is paired with --simplify-merges, the graph
includes all of the necessary information:
.-A---M--. N
/ / \ /
I B R
\ / /
\ / /
`---X--'
Notice that since M is reachable from R, the edge from N to M was
simplified away. However, N still appears in the history as an
important commit because it "pulled" the change R into the main
branch.
The --simplify-by-decoration option allows you to view only the big
picture of the topology of the history, by omitting commits that are
not referenced by tags. Commits are marked as !TREESAME (in other
words, kept after history simplification rules described above) if
(1) they are referenced by tags, or (2) they change the contents of
the paths given on the command line. All other commits are marked as
TREESAME (subject to be simplified away).
By default, the commits are shown in reverse chronological order.
--date-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, but
otherwise show commits in the commit timestamp order.
--author-date-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, but
otherwise show commits in the author timestamp order.
--topo-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, and avoid
showing commits on multiple lines of history intermixed.
For example, in a commit history like this:
---1----2----4----7
\ \
3----5----6----8---
where the numbers denote the order of commit timestamps, git
rev-list and friends with --date-order show the commits in the
timestamp order: 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.
With --topo-order, they would show 8 6 5 3 7 4 2 1 (or 8 7 4 2 6
5 3 1); some older commits are shown before newer ones in order
to avoid showing the commits from two parallel development track
mixed together.
--reverse
Output the commits chosen to be shown (see Commit Limiting
section above) in reverse order. Cannot be combined with
--walk-reflogs.
These options are mostly targeted for packing of Git repositories.
--no-walk[=(sorted|unsorted)]
Only show the given commits, but do not traverse their ancestors.
This has no effect if a range is specified. If the argument
unsorted is given, the commits are shown in the order they were
given on the command line. Otherwise (if sorted or no argument
was given), the commits are shown in reverse chronological order
by commit time. Cannot be combined with --graph.
--do-walk
Overrides a previous --no-walk.
By default, or with --ref-action=update, this command produces no
output on success, as refs are updated directly using an atomic
transaction.
When using --ref-action=print, the output is usable as input to git
update-ref --stdin. It is of the form:
update refs/heads/branch1 ${NEW_branch1_HASH} ${OLD_branch1_HASH}
update refs/heads/branch2 ${NEW_branch2_HASH} ${OLD_branch2_HASH}
update refs/heads/branch3 ${NEW_branch3_HASH} ${OLD_branch3_HASH}
where the number of refs updated depends on the arguments passed and
the shape of the history being replayed. When using --advance, the
number of refs updated is always one, but for --onto, it can be one
or more (rebasing multiple branches simultaneously is supported).
There is no stderr output on conflicts; see the EXIT STATUS section
below.
For a successful, non-conflicted replay, the exit status is 0. When
the replay has conflicts, the exit status is 1. If the replay is not
able to complete (or start) due to some kind of error, the exit
status is something other than 0 or 1.
To simply rebase mybranch onto target:
$ git replay --onto target origin/main..mybranch
The refs are updated atomically and no output is produced on success.
To see what would be updated without actually updating:
$ git replay --ref-action=print --onto target origin/main..mybranch
update refs/heads/mybranch ${NEW_mybranch_HASH} ${OLD_mybranch_HASH}
To cherry-pick the commits from mybranch onto target:
$ git replay --advance target origin/main..mybranch
Note that the first two examples replay the exact same commits and on
top of the exact same new base, they only differ in that the first
updates mybranch to point at the new commits and the second updates
target to point at them.
What if you have a stack of branches, one depending upon another, and
you'd really like to rebase the whole set?
$ git replay --contained --onto origin/main origin/main..tipbranch
All three branches (branch1, branch2, and tipbranch) are updated
atomically.
When calling git replay, one does not need to specify a range of
commits to replay using the syntax A..B; any range expression will
do:
$ git replay --onto origin/main ^base branch1 branch2 branch3
This will simultaneously rebase branch1, branch2, and branch3, all
commits they have since base, playing them on top of origin/main.
These three branches may have commits on top of base that they have
in common, but that does not need to be the case.
Part of the git(1) suite
Git 2.53.0 2026-02-01 GIT-REPLAY(1)
NAME
git-replay - EXPERIMENTAL: Replay commits on a new base, works with
bare repos too
SYNOPSIS
(EXPERIMENTAL!) git replay ([--contained] --onto <newbase> | --advance <branch>) [--ref-action[=<mode>]] <revision-range>
DESCRIPTION
Takes a range of commits and replays them onto a new location. Leaves
the working tree and the index untouched. By default, updates the
relevant references using an atomic transaction (all refs update or
none). Use --ref-action=print to avoid automatic ref updates and
instead get update commands that can be piped to git update-ref
--stdin (see the OUTPUT section below).
THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. THE BEHAVIOR MAY CHANGE.
OPTIONS
--onto <newbase>
Starting point at which to create the new commits. May be any
valid commit, and not just an existing branch name.
When --onto is specified, the branch(es) in the revision range
will be updated to point at the new commits, similar to the way
git rebase --update-refs updates multiple branches in the
affected range.
--advance <branch>
Starting point at which to create the new commits; must be a
branch name.
The history is replayed on top of the <branch> and <branch> is
updated to point at the tip of the resulting history. This is
different from --onto, which uses the target only as a starting
point without updating it.
--contained
Update all branches that point at commits in <revision-range>.
Requires --onto.
--ref-action[=<mode>]
Control how references are updated. The mode can be:
+o update (default): Update refs directly using an atomic
transaction. All refs are updated or none are (all-or-nothing
behavior).
+o print: Output update-ref commands for pipeline use. This is
the traditional behavior where output can be piped to git
update-ref --stdin.
The default mode can be configured via the replay.refAction
configuration variable.
<revision-range>
Range of commits to replay; see "Specifying Ranges" in git-rev-
parse(1). In --advance <branch> mode, the range should have a
single tip, so that it's clear to which tip the advanced <branch>
should point.
Commit Limiting
Besides specifying a range of commits that should be listed using the
special notations explained in the description, additional commit
limiting may be applied.
Using more options generally further limits the output (e.g.
--since=<date1> limits to commits newer than <date1>, and using it
with --grep=<pattern> further limits to commits whose log message has
a line that matches <pattern>), unless otherwise noted.
Note that these are applied before commit ordering and formatting
options, such as --reverse.
-<number>, -n <number>, --max-count=<number>
Limit the output to <number> commits.
--skip=<number>
Skip <number> commits before starting to show the commit output.
--since=<date>, --after=<date>
Show commits more recent than <date>.
--since-as-filter=<date>
Show all commits more recent than <date>. This visits all commits
in the range, rather than stopping at the first commit which is
older than <date>.
--until=<date>, --before=<date>
Show commits older than <date>.
--author=<pattern>, --committer=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with author/committer header
lines that match the <pattern> regular expression. With more than
one --author=<pattern>, commits whose author matches any of the
<pattern> are chosen (similarly for multiple
--committer=<pattern>).
--grep-reflog=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with reflog entries that match
the <pattern> regular expression. With more than one
--grep-reflog, commits whose reflog message matches any of the
given patterns are chosen. It is an error to use this option
unless --walk-reflogs is in use.
--grep=<pattern>
Limit the commits output to ones with a log message that matches
the <pattern> regular expression. With more than one
--grep=<pattern>, commits whose message matches any of the
<pattern> are chosen (but see --all-match).
When --notes is in effect, the message from the notes is matched
as if it were part of the log message.
--all-match
Limit the commits output to ones that match all given --grep,
instead of ones that match at least one.
--invert-grep
Limit the commits output to ones with a log message that do not
match the <pattern> specified with --grep=<pattern>.
-i, --regexp-ignore-case
Match the regular expression limiting patterns without regard to
letter case.
--basic-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be basic regular expressions;
this is the default.
-E, --extended-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be extended regular expressions
instead of the default basic regular expressions.
-F, --fixed-strings
Consider the limiting patterns to be fixed strings (don't
interpret pattern as a regular expression).
-P, --perl-regexp
Consider the limiting patterns to be Perl-compatible regular
expressions.
Support for these types of regular expressions is an optional
compile-time dependency. If Git wasn't compiled with support for
them providing this option will cause it to die.
--remove-empty
Stop when a given path disappears from the tree.
--merges
Print only merge commits. This is exactly the same as
--min-parents=2.
--no-merges
Do not print commits with more than one parent. This is exactly
the same as --max-parents=1.
--min-parents=<number>, --max-parents=<number>, --no-min-parents,
--no-max-parents
Show only commits which have at least (or at most) that many
parent commits. In particular, --max-parents=1 is the same as
--no-merges, --min-parents=2 is the same as --merges.
--max-parents=0 gives all root commits and --min-parents=3 all
octopus merges.
--no-min-parents and --no-max-parents reset these limits (to no
limit) again. Equivalent forms are --min-parents=0 (any commit
has 0 or more parents) and --max-parents=-1 (negative numbers
denote no upper limit).
--first-parent
When finding commits to include, follow only the first parent
commit upon seeing a merge commit. This option can give a better
overview when viewing the evolution of a particular topic branch,
because merges into a topic branch tend to be only about
adjusting to updated upstream from time to time, and this option
allows you to ignore the individual commits brought in to your
history by such a merge.
--exclude-first-parent-only
When finding commits to exclude (with a ^), follow only the first
parent commit upon seeing a merge commit. This can be used to
find the set of changes in a topic branch from the point where it
diverged from the remote branch, given that arbitrary merges can
be valid topic branch changes.
--not
Reverses the meaning of the ^ prefix (or lack thereof) for all
following revision specifiers, up to the next --not. When used on
the command line before --stdin, the revisions passed through
stdin will not be affected by it. Conversely, when passed via
standard input, the revisions passed on the command line will not
be affected by it.
--all
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/, along with HEAD, are listed
on the command line as <commit>.
--branches[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/heads are listed on the
command line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit branches
to ones matching given shell glob. If <pattern> lacks ?, *, or [,
/* at the end is implied.
--tags[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/tags are listed on the command
line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit tags to ones
matching given shell glob. If pattern lacks ?, *, or [, /* at the
end is implied.
--remotes[=<pattern>]
Pretend as if all the refs in refs/remotes are listed on the
command line as <commit>. If <pattern> is given, limit
remote-tracking branches to ones matching given shell glob. If
pattern lacks ?, *, or [, /* at the end is implied.
--glob=<glob-pattern>
Pretend as if all the refs matching shell glob <glob-pattern> are
listed on the command line as <commit>. Leading refs/, is
automatically prepended if missing. If pattern lacks ?, *, or [,
/* at the end is implied.
--exclude=<glob-pattern>
Do not include refs matching <glob-pattern> that the next --all,
--branches, --tags, --remotes, or --glob would otherwise
consider. Repetitions of this option accumulate exclusion
patterns up to the next --all, --branches, --tags, --remotes, or
--glob option (other options or arguments do not clear
accumulated patterns).
The patterns given should not begin with refs/heads, refs/tags,
or refs/remotes when applied to --branches, --tags, or --remotes,
respectively, and they must begin with refs/ when applied to
--glob or --all. If a trailing /* is intended, it must be given
explicitly.
--exclude-hidden=(fetch|receive|uploadpack)
Do not include refs that would be hidden by git-fetch,
git-receive-pack or git-upload-pack by consulting the appropriate
fetch.hideRefs, receive.hideRefs or uploadpack.hideRefs
configuration along with transfer.hideRefs (see git-config(1)).
This option affects the next pseudo-ref option --all or --glob
and is cleared after processing them.
--reflog
Pretend as if all objects mentioned by reflogs are listed on the
command line as <commit>.
--alternate-refs
Pretend as if all objects mentioned as ref tips of alternate
repositories were listed on the command line. An alternate
repository is any repository whose object directory is specified
in objects/info/alternates. The set of included objects may be
modified by core.alternateRefsCommand, etc. See git-config(1).
--single-worktree
By default, all working trees will be examined by the following
options when there are more than one (see git-worktree(1)):
--all, --reflog and --indexed-objects. This option forces them to
examine the current working tree only.
--ignore-missing
Upon seeing an invalid object name in the input, pretend as if
the bad input was not given.
--bisect
Pretend as if the bad bisection ref refs/bisect/bad was listed
and as if it was followed by --not and the good bisection refs
refs/bisect/good-* on the command line.
--stdin
In addition to getting arguments from the command line, read them
from standard input as well. This accepts commits and
pseudo-options like --all and --glob=. When a -- separator is
seen, the following input is treated as paths and used to limit
the result. Flags like --not which are read via standard input
are only respected for arguments passed in the same way and will
not influence any subsequent command line arguments.
--cherry-mark
Like --cherry-pick (see below) but mark equivalent commits with =
rather than omitting them, and inequivalent ones with +.
--cherry-pick
Omit any commit that introduces the same change as another commit
on the "other side" when the set of commits are limited with
symmetric difference.
For example, if you have two branches, A and B, a usual way to
list all commits on only one side of them is with --left-right
(see the example below in the description of the --left-right
option). However, it shows the commits that were cherry-picked
from the other branch (for example, "3rd on b" may be
cherry-picked from branch A). With this option, such pairs of
commits are excluded from the output.
--left-only, --right-only
List only commits on the respective side of a symmetric
difference, i.e. only those which would be marked < resp. > by
--left-right.
For example, --cherry-pick --right-only A...B omits those commits
from B which are in A or are patch-equivalent to a commit in A.
In other words, this lists the + commits from git cherry A B.
More precisely, --cherry-pick --right-only --no-merges gives the
exact list.
--cherry
A synonym for --right-only --cherry-mark --no-merges; useful to
limit the output to the commits on our side and mark those that
have been applied to the other side of a forked history with git
log --cherry upstream...mybranch, similar to git cherry upstream
mybranch.
-g, --walk-reflogs
Instead of walking the commit ancestry chain, walk reflog entries
from the most recent one to older ones. When this option is used
you cannot specify commits to exclude (that is, ^<commit>,
<commit1>..<commit2>, and <commit1>...<commit2> notations cannot
be used).
With --pretty format other than oneline and reference (for
obvious reasons), this causes the output to have two extra lines
of information taken from the reflog. The reflog designator in
the output may be shown as ref@{<Nth>} (where <Nth> is the
reverse-chronological index in the reflog) or as
ref@{<timestamp>} (with the <timestamp> for that entry),
depending on a few rules:
1. If the starting point is specified as ref@{<Nth>}, show the
index format.
2. If the starting point was specified as ref@{now}, show the
timestamp format.
3. If neither was used, but --date was given on the command
line, show the timestamp in the format requested by --date.
4. Otherwise, show the index format.
Under --pretty=oneline, the commit message is prefixed with this
information on the same line. This option cannot be combined with
--reverse. See also git-reflog(1).
Under --pretty=reference, this information will not be shown at
all.
--merge
Show commits touching conflicted paths in the range
HEAD...<other>, where <other> is the first existing pseudoref in
MERGE_HEAD, CHERRY_PICK_HEAD, REVERT_HEAD or REBASE_HEAD. Only
works when the index has unmerged entries. This option can be
used to show relevant commits when resolving conflicts from a
3-way merge.
--boundary
Output excluded boundary commits. Boundary commits are prefixed
with -.
History Simplification
Sometimes you are only interested in parts of the history, for
example the commits modifying a particular <path>. But there are two
parts of History Simplification, one part is selecting the commits
and the other is how to do it, as there are various strategies to
simplify the history.
The following options select the commits to be shown:
<paths>
Commits modifying the given <paths> are selected.
--simplify-by-decoration
Commits that are referred by some branch or tag are selected.
Note that extra commits can be shown to give a meaningful history.
The following options affect the way the simplification is performed:
Default mode
Simplifies the history to the simplest history explaining the
final state of the tree. Simplest because it prunes some side
branches if the end result is the same (i.e. merging branches
with the same content)
--show-pulls
Include all commits from the default mode, but also any merge
commits that are not TREESAME to the first parent but are
TREESAME to a later parent. This mode is helpful for showing the
merge commits that "first introduced" a change to a branch.
--full-history
Same as the default mode, but does not prune some history.
--dense
Only the selected commits are shown, plus some to have a
meaningful history.
--sparse
All commits in the simplified history are shown.
--simplify-merges
Additional option to --full-history to remove some needless
merges from the resulting history, as there are no selected
commits contributing to this merge.
--ancestry-path[=<commit>]
When given a range of commits to display (e.g.
<commit1>..<commit2> or <commit2> ^<commit1>), and a commit
<commit> in that range, only display commits in that range that
are ancestors of <commit>, descendants of <commit>, or <commit>
itself. If no commit is specified, use <commit1> (the excluded
part of the range) as <commit>. Can be passed multiple times; if
so, a commit is included if it is any of the commits given or if
it is an ancestor or descendant of one of them.
A more detailed explanation follows.
Suppose you specified foo as the <paths>. We shall call commits that
modify foo !TREESAME, and the rest TREESAME. (In a diff filtered for
foo, they look different and equal, respectively.)
In the following, we will always refer to the same example history to
illustrate the differences between simplification settings. We assume
that you are filtering for a file foo in this commit graph:
.-A---M---N---O---P---Q
/ / / / / /
I B C D E Y
\ / / / / /
`-------------' X
The horizontal line of history A---Q is taken to be the first parent
of each merge. The commits are:
+o I is the initial commit, in which foo exists with contents asdf,
and a file quux exists with contents quux. Initial commits are
compared to an empty tree, so I is !TREESAME.
+o In A, foo contains just foo.
+o B contains the same change as A. Its merge M is trivial and hence
TREESAME to all parents.
+o C does not change foo, but its merge N changes it to foobar, so
it is not TREESAME to any parent.
+o D sets foo to baz. Its merge O combines the strings from N and D
to foobarbaz; i.e., it is not TREESAME to any parent.
+o E changes quux to xyzzy, and its merge P combines the strings to
quux xyzzy. P is TREESAME to O, but not to E.
+o X is an independent root commit that added a new file side, and Y
modified it. Y is TREESAME to X. Its merge Q added side to P,
and Q is TREESAME to P, but not to Y.
rev-list walks backwards through history, including or excluding
commits based on whether --full-history and/or parent rewriting (via
--parents or --children) are used. The following settings are
available.
Default mode
Commits are included if they are not TREESAME to any parent
(though this can be changed, see --sparse below). If the commit
was a merge, and it was TREESAME to one parent, follow only that
parent. (Even if there are several TREESAME parents, follow only
one of them.) Otherwise, follow all parents.
This results in:
.-A---N---O
/ / /
I---------D
Note how the rule to only follow the TREESAME parent, if one is
available, removed B from consideration entirely. C was
considered via N, but is TREESAME. Root commits are compared to
an empty tree, so I is !TREESAME.
Parent/child relations are only visible with --parents, but that
does not affect the commits selected in default mode, so we have
shown the parent lines.
--full-history without parent rewriting
This mode differs from the default in one point: always follow
all parents of a merge, even if it is TREESAME to one of them.
Even if more than one side of the merge has commits that are
included, this does not imply that the merge itself is! In the
example, we get
I A B N D O P Q
M was excluded because it is TREESAME to both parents. E, C and
B were all walked, but only B was !TREESAME, so the others do not
appear.
Note that without parent rewriting, it is not really possible to
talk about the parent/child relationships between the commits, so
we show them disconnected.
--full-history with parent rewriting
Ordinary commits are only included if they are !TREESAME (though
this can be changed, see --sparse below).
Merges are always included. However, their parent list is
rewritten: Along each parent, prune away commits that are not
included themselves. This results in
.-A---M---N---O---P---Q
/ / / / /
I B / D /
\ / / / /
`-------------'
Compare to --full-history without rewriting above. Note that E
was pruned away because it is TREESAME, but the parent list of P
was rewritten to contain E's parent I. The same happened for C
and N, and X, Y and Q.
In addition to the above settings, you can change whether TREESAME
affects inclusion:
--dense
Commits that are walked are included if they are not TREESAME to
any parent.
--sparse
All commits that are walked are included.
Note that without --full-history, this still simplifies merges:
if one of the parents is TREESAME, we follow only that one, so
the other sides of the merge are never walked.
--simplify-merges
First, build a history graph in the same way that --full-history
with parent rewriting does (see above).
Then simplify each commit C to its replacement C' in the final
history according to the following rules:
+o Set C' to C.
+o Replace each parent P of C' with its simplification P'. In
the process, drop parents that are ancestors of other parents
or that are root commits TREESAME to an empty tree, and
remove duplicates, but take care to never drop all parents
that we are TREESAME to.
+o If after this parent rewriting, C' is a root or merge commit
(has zero or >1 parents), a boundary commit, or !TREESAME, it
remains. Otherwise, it is replaced with its only parent.
The effect of this is best shown by way of comparing to
--full-history with parent rewriting. The example turns into:
.-A---M---N---O
/ / /
I B D
\ / /
`---------'
Note the major differences in N, P, and Q over --full-history:
+o N's parent list had I removed, because it is an ancestor of
the other parent M. Still, N remained because it is
!TREESAME.
+o P's parent list similarly had I removed. P was then removed
completely, because it had one parent and is TREESAME.
+o Q's parent list had Y simplified to X. X was then removed,
because it was a TREESAME root. Q was then removed
completely, because it had one parent and is TREESAME.
There is another simplification mode available:
--ancestry-path[=<commit>]
Limit the displayed commits to those which are an ancestor of
<commit>, or which are a descendant of <commit>, or are <commit>
itself.
As an example use case, consider the following commit history:
D---E-------F
/ \ \
B---C---G---H---I---J
/ \
A-------K---------------L--M
A regular D..M computes the set of commits that are ancestors of
M, but excludes the ones that are ancestors of D. This is useful
to see what happened to the history leading to M since D, in the
sense that "what does M have that did not exist in D". The result
in this example would be all the commits, except A and B (and D
itself, of course).
When we want to find out what commits in M are contaminated with
the bug introduced by D and need fixing, however, we might want
to view only the subset of D..M that are actually descendants of
D, i.e. excluding C and K. This is exactly what the
--ancestry-path option does. Applied to the D..M range, it
results in:
E-------F
\ \
G---H---I---J
\
L--M
We can also use --ancestry-path=D instead of --ancestry-path
which means the same thing when applied to the D..M range but is
just more explicit.
If we instead are interested in a given topic within this range,
and all commits affected by that topic, we may only want to view
the subset of D..M which contain that topic in their ancestry
path. So, using --ancestry-path=H D..M for example would result
in:
E
\
C---G---H---I---J
\
L--M
Whereas --ancestry-path=K D..M would result in
K---------------L--M
Before discussing another option, --show-pulls, we need to create a
new example history.
A common problem users face when looking at simplified history is
that a commit they know changed a file somehow does not appear in the
file's simplified history. Let's demonstrate a new example and show
how options such as --full-history and --simplify-merges works in
that case:
.-A---M-----C--N---O---P
/ / \ \ \/ / /
I B \ R-'`-Z' /
\ / \/ /
\ / /\ /
`---X--' `---Y--'
For this example, suppose I created file.txt which was modified by A,
B, and X in different ways. The single-parent commits C, Z, and Y do
not change file.txt. The merge commit M was created by resolving the
merge conflict to include both changes from A and B and hence is not
TREESAME to either. The merge commit R, however, was created by
ignoring the contents of file.txt at M and taking only the contents
of file.txt at X. Hence, R is TREESAME to X but not M. Finally, the
natural merge resolution to create N is to take the contents of
file.txt at R, so N is TREESAME to R but not C. The merge commits O
and P are TREESAME to their first parents, but not to their second
parents, Z and Y respectively.
When using the default mode, N and R both have a TREESAME parent, so
those edges are walked and the others are ignored. The resulting
history graph is:
I---X
When using --full-history, Git walks every edge. This will discover
the commits A and B and the merge M, but also will reveal the merge
commits O and P. With parent rewriting, the resulting graph is:
.-A---M--------N---O---P
/ / \ \ \/ / /
I B \ R-'`--' /
\ / \/ /
\ / /\ /
`---X--' `------'
Here, the merge commits O and P contribute extra noise, as they did
not actually contribute a change to file.txt. They only merged a
topic that was based on an older version of file.txt. This is a
common issue in repositories using a workflow where many contributors
work in parallel and merge their topic branches along a single trunk:
many unrelated merges appear in the --full-history results.
When using the --simplify-merges option, the commits O and P
disappear from the results. This is because the rewritten second
parents of O and P are reachable from their first parents. Those
edges are removed and then the commits look like single-parent
commits that are TREESAME to their parent. This also happens to the
commit N, resulting in a history view as follows:
.-A---M--.
/ / \
I B R
\ / /
\ / /
`---X--'
In this view, we see all of the important single-parent changes from
A, B, and X. We also see the carefully-resolved merge M and the
not-so-carefully-resolved merge R. This is usually enough information
to determine why the commits A and B "disappeared" from history in
the default view. However, there are a few issues with this approach.
The first issue is performance. Unlike any previous option, the
--simplify-merges option requires walking the entire commit history
before returning a single result. This can make the option difficult
to use for very large repositories.
The second issue is one of auditing. When many contributors are
working on the same repository, it is important which merge commits
introduced a change into an important branch. The problematic merge R
above is not likely to be the merge commit that was used to merge
into an important branch. Instead, the merge N was used to merge R
and X into the important branch. This commit may have information
about why the change X came to override the changes from A and B in
its commit message.
--show-pulls
In addition to the commits shown in the default history, show
each merge commit that is not TREESAME to its first parent but is
TREESAME to a later parent.
When a merge commit is included by --show-pulls, the merge is
treated as if it "pulled" the change from another branch. When
using --show-pulls on this example (and no other options) the
resulting graph is:
I---X---R---N
Here, the merge commits R and N are included because they pulled
the commits X and R into the base branch, respectively. These
merges are the reason the commits A and B do not appear in the
default history.
When --show-pulls is paired with --simplify-merges, the graph
includes all of the necessary information:
.-A---M--. N
/ / \ /
I B R
\ / /
\ / /
`---X--'
Notice that since M is reachable from R, the edge from N to M was
simplified away. However, N still appears in the history as an
important commit because it "pulled" the change R into the main
branch.
The --simplify-by-decoration option allows you to view only the big
picture of the topology of the history, by omitting commits that are
not referenced by tags. Commits are marked as !TREESAME (in other
words, kept after history simplification rules described above) if
(1) they are referenced by tags, or (2) they change the contents of
the paths given on the command line. All other commits are marked as
TREESAME (subject to be simplified away).
Commit Ordering
By default, the commits are shown in reverse chronological order.
--date-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, but
otherwise show commits in the commit timestamp order.
--author-date-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, but
otherwise show commits in the author timestamp order.
--topo-order
Show no parents before all of its children are shown, and avoid
showing commits on multiple lines of history intermixed.
For example, in a commit history like this:
---1----2----4----7
\ \
3----5----6----8---
where the numbers denote the order of commit timestamps, git
rev-list and friends with --date-order show the commits in the
timestamp order: 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.
With --topo-order, they would show 8 6 5 3 7 4 2 1 (or 8 7 4 2 6
5 3 1); some older commits are shown before newer ones in order
to avoid showing the commits from two parallel development track
mixed together.
--reverse
Output the commits chosen to be shown (see Commit Limiting
section above) in reverse order. Cannot be combined with
--walk-reflogs.
Object Traversal
These options are mostly targeted for packing of Git repositories.
--no-walk[=(sorted|unsorted)]
Only show the given commits, but do not traverse their ancestors.
This has no effect if a range is specified. If the argument
unsorted is given, the commits are shown in the order they were
given on the command line. Otherwise (if sorted or no argument
was given), the commits are shown in reverse chronological order
by commit time. Cannot be combined with --graph.
--do-walk
Overrides a previous --no-walk.
OUTPUT
By default, or with --ref-action=update, this command produces no
output on success, as refs are updated directly using an atomic
transaction.
When using --ref-action=print, the output is usable as input to git
update-ref --stdin. It is of the form:
update refs/heads/branch1 ${NEW_branch1_HASH} ${OLD_branch1_HASH}
update refs/heads/branch2 ${NEW_branch2_HASH} ${OLD_branch2_HASH}
update refs/heads/branch3 ${NEW_branch3_HASH} ${OLD_branch3_HASH}
where the number of refs updated depends on the arguments passed and
the shape of the history being replayed. When using --advance, the
number of refs updated is always one, but for --onto, it can be one
or more (rebasing multiple branches simultaneously is supported).
There is no stderr output on conflicts; see the EXIT STATUS section
below.
EXIT STATUS
For a successful, non-conflicted replay, the exit status is 0. When
the replay has conflicts, the exit status is 1. If the replay is not
able to complete (or start) due to some kind of error, the exit
status is something other than 0 or 1.
EXAMPLES
To simply rebase mybranch onto target:
$ git replay --onto target origin/main..mybranch
The refs are updated atomically and no output is produced on success.
To see what would be updated without actually updating:
$ git replay --ref-action=print --onto target origin/main..mybranch
update refs/heads/mybranch ${NEW_mybranch_HASH} ${OLD_mybranch_HASH}
To cherry-pick the commits from mybranch onto target:
$ git replay --advance target origin/main..mybranch
Note that the first two examples replay the exact same commits and on
top of the exact same new base, they only differ in that the first
updates mybranch to point at the new commits and the second updates
target to point at them.
What if you have a stack of branches, one depending upon another, and
you'd really like to rebase the whole set?
$ git replay --contained --onto origin/main origin/main..tipbranch
All three branches (branch1, branch2, and tipbranch) are updated
atomically.
When calling git replay, one does not need to specify a range of
commits to replay using the syntax A..B; any range expression will
do:
$ git replay --onto origin/main ^base branch1 branch2 branch3
This will simultaneously rebase branch1, branch2, and branch3, all
commits they have since base, playing them on top of origin/main.
These three branches may have commits on top of base that they have
in common, but that does not need to be the case.
GIT
Part of the git(1) suite
Git 2.53.0 2026-02-01 GIT-REPLAY(1)